"We feel like we need a break, to go somewhere with no paparazzi or gossip magazines, where we don't have to feel so self-conscious. I can't live my life that way and pretend I'm not bothered. . . . It deeply disturbs me. So we may go and live in Amsterdam or Greece or somewhere."
That's "Brokeback Mountain" actress Michelle Williams to Interview magazine. So, Miss Williams and her beloved, Heath Ledger, and their baby, Matilda, might take a well-deserved sabbatical. (They met and fell in love on the intense "Brokeback" set, saw that movie lavishly praised as a pop culture phenomenon, had a child, were both Oscar-nominated, neither won, and then they watched as "Crash" took the ultimate prize. Greece is divine, kids.)
***
Wasn't it only yesterday that Britney Spears was everybody's adorable fledgling music goddess? Didn't Madonna herself anoint her as successor? (That fabled MTV kiss) Yes! But in the twinkling of an eye it seems, Spears' image has taken a drubbing from which many insist she'll never recover. Miss Spears' two marriages -- one hasty, one ongoing but a veritable train wreck of low-rent gossip, her sometimes-careless habits, her refusal to starve herself back to her "pre-pregnancy body" have combined to leave Spears hung out to dry. She is a helpless pincushion for the weeklies.
Still, maybe things aren't as bad as they seem. Spears is rumored ready to pursue Quincy Jones to help revamp her musical sound into something funkier, more mature. And she was recently spotted shopping at Prada and Gucci. She loves her flip-flops and cutoffs, but. . .
Now all the mags say she is possibly pregnant again, which would rule out career rejuvenation and fashion makeovers for a while. And you know what -- maybe flipflops and cut-offs and a normal-sized body, more babies and even Kevin Federline are exactly what this sweet Southern girl who began working as a child, wants.
Replica Panerai Watch***
It's over for a year. And whether the Academy Award-winning films and nominated actors and craftspeople "resonate" with the moviegoers -- as critics of this year's awards keep saying -- seems to me to be completely beside the point. Oscar isn't supposed to be about box office, TV ratings, popularity or PR. (Though it has often been.) Oscar is supposed to be about an almost forgotten thing in the 21st century -- creative excellence.
Voters for the Oscars are the film industry itself -- actors, directors, writers and masterful technicians. They are not supposed to be worried about pleasing John Q. Public or TV number-crunching nerds or network executives or the Christian right or whatever political party happens to be in the White House on any given year.
All this talk about how the public didn't see or like the nominated movies at their local Cineplex is probably the first aesthetic backhanded compliment Hollywood has received in years. (George Clooney more or less summed this up in his acceptance speech.)
Academy Award winners, losers and also-rans comprise a unique year of choice and superior film-making.
In 2005 we were presented with controversial, offbeat, politically incorrect, less-expensive, thought-provoking and in some cases, cringe-inducing screen efforts, made with intelligence and substance. All five of the nominated movies were of high caliber, most with meaningful themes. Performers and other nominees were so good, you could hardly quibble with any of them. Technical expertise has never been better.
You may disdain, dislike or be bored by the Academy Awards, but you and I aren't voting. We are onlookers as Oscar awards his own. It should not have anything to do with that ultimate, meaningless phenomenon of American life -- those things called "general popularity" and "celebrity worship."
Patek Philippe WatchContact Liz Smith at , or write to her in care of Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, NY 14207.
...